<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreigners not Welcome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/</link>
	<description>Your Branch Office in Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apologize and I will give you the photo - more on dealing with local suppliers</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Apologize and I will give you the photo - more on dealing with local suppliers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>[...] picked up by the China Law blog and was separately discussed by other foreigners as well on their own blogs as this is no an isolated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] picked up by the China Law blog and was separately discussed by other foreigners as well on their own blogs as this is no an isolated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apologize and I will give you the photo - more on dealing with local suppliers &#124; The ACF China Co - Millstone Trading</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Apologize and I will give you the photo - more on dealing with local suppliers &#124; The ACF China Co - Millstone Trading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>[...] picked up by the China Law blog and was separately discussed by other foreigners as well on their own blogs as this is no an isolated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] picked up by the China Law blog and was separately discussed by other foreigners as well on their own blogs as this is no an isolated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisclanton.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Olympic torch in Nanjing, &#8220;OUR Olympics,&#8221; and my own attempt at Chinese Nationalism</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisclanton.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Olympic torch in Nanjing, &#8220;OUR Olympics,&#8221; and my own attempt at Chinese Nationalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] that implies that their presence is not really that welcome at the rally torch run. For example, here (also a very good article about issues of nationalism in China). The motto for this olympics&#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that implies that their presence is not really that welcome at the rally torch run. For example, here (also a very good article about issues of nationalism in China). The motto for this olympics&#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-66</guid>
		<description>OK, last comment here.  1. No one is claiming Evil Intent on the part of the Chinese.  I am implying though, that with investment comes responsibility and prior to international pressure, there was little or none.  2. Your example of Chinese employees flushing toxins down their own rivers as employees of an MNC is interesting but hardly makes a point.  No one, least of all me, is claiming that MNC&#039;s or private firms are innocent in China--but again, that&#039;s not the point.  

By the way, the argument &quot;yea, well you did it first&quot; is really just as ineffective for adults to use as it is for children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, last comment here.  1. No one is claiming Evil Intent on the part of the Chinese.  I am implying though, that with investment comes responsibility and prior to international pressure, there was little or none.  2. Your example of Chinese employees flushing toxins down their own rivers as employees of an MNC is interesting but hardly makes a point.  No one, least of all me, is claiming that MNC&#8217;s or private firms are innocent in China&#8211;but again, that&#8217;s not the point.  </p>
<p>By the way, the argument &#8220;yea, well you did it first&#8221; is really just as ineffective for adults to use as it is for children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FOARP</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>FOARP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-64</guid>
		<description>@David - Whilst I&#039;m perhaps more inclined in many to see evil intent in Chinese investment in Africa, apart from the recent incident of arms sales to Zimbabwe and the Sudan, I have seen no real evidence of them doing anything other than what has been done by other countries.

As for the involvement of foreign companies in China, I personally believe them to be subject to a tighter set of checks and balances than local companies due to having less influence over the local government and being, on average, larger scale operations. This does not mean that things which are quite wrong are not being done by foreign companies in China. I will always remember the words of a man I knew who had worked as a contractor for BASF in Nanjing and had spoken of them flushing whole vats full of poisonous material into the Yangzi river when it was discovered that they had mixed wrong. Sure, this is only one incident, but from what I am told it is demonstrative of wider practices among many companies operating in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David &#8211; Whilst I&#8217;m perhaps more inclined in many to see evil intent in Chinese investment in Africa, apart from the recent incident of arms sales to Zimbabwe and the Sudan, I have seen no real evidence of them doing anything other than what has been done by other countries.</p>
<p>As for the involvement of foreign companies in China, I personally believe them to be subject to a tighter set of checks and balances than local companies due to having less influence over the local government and being, on average, larger scale operations. This does not mean that things which are quite wrong are not being done by foreign companies in China. I will always remember the words of a man I knew who had worked as a contractor for BASF in Nanjing and had spoken of them flushing whole vats full of poisonous material into the Yangzi river when it was discovered that they had mixed wrong. Sure, this is only one incident, but from what I am told it is demonstrative of wider practices among many companies operating in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Yes, I have met a few (very) well educated Chinese who are well travelled and very thoughtful.  But I&#039;m not sure that that is a balanced assessment of the majority of mainland Chinese--which is whom we are talking about.  Agreed, I could have said it better, but the fact that there is little to no cultural diversity or taught appreciate of anything foreign (except for FDI and Tech transfer) still makes this, I think a valid opinion.

I have lived through multiple politically controlled &quot;burns&quot; here in China and, again, justified or not, right or wrong, is not the question for any of them.  The reality is that nationalism is used as a tool and few people (Americans included) realize how often they are being played, I think.

I really have to say I disagree here with your investment comparison.  To compare private/corporate investment dollars from the West into China to Sinopec or other Chinse government controlled/owned investments in Africa is at best not at all accurate and worst deliberately misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I have met a few (very) well educated Chinese who are well travelled and very thoughtful.  But I&#8217;m not sure that that is a balanced assessment of the majority of mainland Chinese&#8211;which is whom we are talking about.  Agreed, I could have said it better, but the fact that there is little to no cultural diversity or taught appreciate of anything foreign (except for FDI and Tech transfer) still makes this, I think a valid opinion.</p>
<p>I have lived through multiple politically controlled &#8220;burns&#8221; here in China and, again, justified or not, right or wrong, is not the question for any of them.  The reality is that nationalism is used as a tool and few people (Americans included) realize how often they are being played, I think.</p>
<p>I really have to say I disagree here with your investment comparison.  To compare private/corporate investment dollars from the West into China to Sinopec or other Chinse government controlled/owned investments in Africa is at best not at all accurate and worst deliberately misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FOARP</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>FOARP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-60</guid>
		<description>@David - &quot;for a Chinese to comment on someone else’s lack of multicultural exposure is truly rich&quot;

I think you could have phrased that better, Chinese people on average have little opportunity to study and live in country in which the main function of the media seemd to be telling people that they are Chinese and what that means. However,  I&#039;m sure you have met Chinese people who are widely travelled and experienced also, I know I have.

&quot;I don’t have a clue if it was a conspiracy or not. The point here was the REACTION&quot;

I have to disagree here, if there had been solid proof that there had been a conspiracy then that might have justified the level of anger that Chinese people felt.  The &#039;reaction&#039; only becomes objectionable when you take into account the fact that no real evidence has ever been shown that the bombing was anything but an accident. However, even if everyone had been convinced that it had been a total accident then some level of anger might still have been justified. I suppose it is worth mentioning here that NATO actually managed to drop bombs in neighbouring countries by accident - 300 meters is neither here nor there.

&quot;only Chinese believe that they are actually doing good in Africa&quot;

The main theme here seems to be that it is impossible to invest in poor and undemocratic countries without doing evil. You must then ask if the west is doing good in China - consider that western companies do contribute to Chinese polution, that we have sold them weapons and are still selling them technology that may have police/military application. 

@Jxie - &quot;What is so particularly wrong with Liu’s comments?&quot;

I too felt uncomfortable with it. Firstly, it reflected a mentality of inferiority - nobody had been saying that people of Asian extraction could not compete in such a race.  Secondly, it showed an un-sportsman-like attitude. When a win is a victory for people of yellow skin everywhere, you have to ask: would a loss have been a defeat?

&quot;not in Africa itself.&quot;

Africans are fairly negative about all foreign involvement in their countries, let&#039;s leave it at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David &#8211; &#8220;for a Chinese to comment on someone else’s lack of multicultural exposure is truly rich&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you could have phrased that better, Chinese people on average have little opportunity to study and live in country in which the main function of the media seemd to be telling people that they are Chinese and what that means. However,  I&#8217;m sure you have met Chinese people who are widely travelled and experienced also, I know I have.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t have a clue if it was a conspiracy or not. The point here was the REACTION&#8221;</p>
<p>I have to disagree here, if there had been solid proof that there had been a conspiracy then that might have justified the level of anger that Chinese people felt.  The &#8216;reaction&#8217; only becomes objectionable when you take into account the fact that no real evidence has ever been shown that the bombing was anything but an accident. However, even if everyone had been convinced that it had been a total accident then some level of anger might still have been justified. I suppose it is worth mentioning here that NATO actually managed to drop bombs in neighbouring countries by accident &#8211; 300 meters is neither here nor there.</p>
<p>&#8220;only Chinese believe that they are actually doing good in Africa&#8221;</p>
<p>The main theme here seems to be that it is impossible to invest in poor and undemocratic countries without doing evil. You must then ask if the west is doing good in China &#8211; consider that western companies do contribute to Chinese polution, that we have sold them weapons and are still selling them technology that may have police/military application. </p>
<p>@Jxie &#8211; &#8220;What is so particularly wrong with Liu’s comments?&#8221;</p>
<p>I too felt uncomfortable with it. Firstly, it reflected a mentality of inferiority &#8211; nobody had been saying that people of Asian extraction could not compete in such a race.  Secondly, it showed an un-sportsman-like attitude. When a win is a victory for people of yellow skin everywhere, you have to ask: would a loss have been a defeat?</p>
<p>&#8220;not in Africa itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Africans are fairly negative about all foreign involvement in their countries, let&#8217;s leave it at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://silkroadintl.net/blog/2008/05/10/foreigners-not-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silkroadintl.net/blog/?p=266#comment-59</guid>
		<description>OK, Jxie,  a couple of quick points.  Let me guess, you&#039;re a Chinese foreign exchange student?

First, the US was wrong to bomb the embassy.  But I don&#039;t have a clue if it was a conspiracy or not.    The point here was the REACTION.

Second, NOTHING is wrong with Liu&#039;s comments or his success!  I&#039;m only interested in what it says about people&#039;s mindset.  I&#039;m thrilled by his success and the &quot;next generation&quot; of athletes.  Again, the point was the reaction, not him.

Third, for a Chinese to comment on someone else&#039;s lack of multicultural exposure is truly rich.  I guess you missed the fact that I have an MA in Southeast Asian Cultural Anthropology, lived in Thailand for 4 years and work in multiple SEA countries.

Finally, only Chinese believe that they are actually doing good in Africa--do a little more reading outside of Xinhua.  Africans kidnaping Chinese engineers?  Boats being refused port? New legislation to limit foreign investment in certain industries?  None of the news about Africa having issues with the Chinese is coming from the West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Jxie,  a couple of quick points.  Let me guess, you&#8217;re a Chinese foreign exchange student?</p>
<p>First, the US was wrong to bomb the embassy.  But I don&#8217;t have a clue if it was a conspiracy or not.    The point here was the REACTION.</p>
<p>Second, NOTHING is wrong with Liu&#8217;s comments or his success!  I&#8217;m only interested in what it says about people&#8217;s mindset.  I&#8217;m thrilled by his success and the &#8220;next generation&#8221; of athletes.  Again, the point was the reaction, not him.</p>
<p>Third, for a Chinese to comment on someone else&#8217;s lack of multicultural exposure is truly rich.  I guess you missed the fact that I have an MA in Southeast Asian Cultural Anthropology, lived in Thailand for 4 years and work in multiple SEA countries.</p>
<p>Finally, only Chinese believe that they are actually doing good in Africa&#8211;do a little more reading outside of Xinhua.  Africans kidnaping Chinese engineers?  Boats being refused port? New legislation to limit foreign investment in certain industries?  None of the news about Africa having issues with the Chinese is coming from the West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
