Entries Tagged as ''

Three and a Half Kinds of Factories

It goes without saying that not all factories are created equal. Not all factories with international experience are equal either. Certainly there is a level that you’d prefer to work with if price was constant. But this isn’t a perfect world so we need to talk about with whom you actually choose to work.

If you’re not here on the ground every day, it’s helpful to know some generals about the differences in factories that are available here. This is certainly a sweeping generalization as there are possibly millions of factories in China. But I’ve worked with, audited and visited hundreds and hundreds of different factories here, in Thailand and Taiwan. And some generalizations are possible, I think, if for nothing other a base-point to start the discussion. So, here is my simplified overview of factory options with in China.

Purely Domestic.

Like the name implies they service the Chinese market. This nomenclature relates more to the clientele than the capabilities, but I find that they are analogous in many important aspects—quality and customer service being two of the most important ones.

These factories may have some really modern equipment and talented people. They may have a lot of investment capital and new buildings. My experience is that they are aggressive in sales and have decent facilities and equipment but don’t have the skills or experience to work immediately with international clients. They may not have the correct licenses to export product either.

There has been a rise, a fall and a new rise in these types of facilities over the last 10 years in China. Starting in the 90’s every factory that wasn’t specifically built by an MNC fit into this category. In Guangdong province the numbers started to fall off as the markets and the industrials zones matured. At the same time, in the last 10 years, a rise in these smaller domestic facilities happened in Zhejiang, Jiangsu and other coastal areas around Shanghai. In the last two years I’ve seen more and more of these faculties come on line as the domestic market builds and the export economy decreases in relative importance.

Most factories that I visit/use in this category have anywhere from 20 to 200 people. They have typically been in business for 5 years or less. One of the owners/managers knows the industry well and has worked in it for years. There are typically a few similarly experienced engineers but most employees are either relatively new and/or migrant laborers that are new and significantly less experienced.

Working with these factories can be both very rewarding and very frustrating. Usually they are excited about foreign business. They are willing to learn and they go out of their way to be good hosts. The problem is that they often don’t know what they don’t know about international standards. They think they know: “Foreign clients are going to be more strict than domestic clients.” But when it comes down to it, 9 times out of ten they either can’t or won’t meet the standards that are expected. Whether for (unexpected) cost overruns or simply the inability to achieve the necessary quality standards most orders with these guys end in disappointment. They try. They want to do it. They are the lowest price. They may have equipment every bit as good as bigger players in the industry. They are often really nice guys. But you can’t sell bad product no matter how nice the people making it are.

On a macro level to make it work out usually takes more time to finish production than foreign markets are willing to wait. And on a more personal level, it probably takes more patience and trips to China than most foreigners are willing to invest.

The odd time when it works out it’s really great—it’s like Chinese fate smiled and the stars aligned. You get good product at the lowest cost and the factory learned from the experience and can now parlay this successful experience into more international sales.

But, as in all cycles, things are out of line more than inline, and success is the exception rather than the rule. The fact is, that as long as these factories are offering the lowest prices and foreigners are doing limited DD there will be both a continuation of the 9 failures and 1 success. (That should be a CCP political slogan—maybe we can get Mr. Hu to use that one some time. Say it again, “9 failures and 1 success.” It’ll grow on you.)

Use these guys under two circumstances only: First, if you don’t really care about the quality of the product you are putting out. If you don’t care about quality, these guys will be quick, dirty and cheap—and sometimes that’s what people really do want. This isn’t a slam. Low-end product has it’s place in the market and, obviously, people continue to buy it.

Second, if you have the time, money, desire and long-term foresight to help someone to develop from the bottom up this is a fantastic opportunity to develop a loyal supplier. But in all the years that I’ve been working here I’ve only seen one company pull this off successfully—and they came here ahead of the market with the intent to do just this very thing. If you need product now and you think that you can bring someone along while you’re producing product to sell you need to either have very (very, very, very) long lead times or be willing to accept lower quality on the first few production runs.

Mostly Domestic, Partly International

The difference between these guys and the purely domestic factories is experience and clientele. They can be just as small, just as young in the industry and with equally few really talented engineers. But for whatever reason they have experience working with international clientele, usually via a Hong Kong trading company.

What does a little more experience mean to you? It’s means your costs will be a bit higher. But it also means that your higher standards will be mostly understood and expected. Most importantly, it means that the skill level necessary to achieve your quality standards should already be in place.

If you are looking for the “bargain” in China, this is it. These guys have the skill but not the market positioning. They know they can compete internationally but they don’t have the exposure and are still hungry for bigger clients and more money. Often they are tired of being limited to the clients provided by trading companies and want both the margins and the face that comes from having their “own” international clientele.

Usually these guys will have some sort of “international” sales department. This usually consists of one of the owners’ relatives that has graduated from college or a non-related English major. This is both good and bad. It’s good because (if you can’t speak Chinese) you have some one to help you out, someone to talk to inside the factory. But chances are the English major was hired specifically because they have an English degree and my not have a clue about whatever your producing or even how most of the factory works (or even be able to speak much English).

Other benefits of working with these guys include: they’ll most certainly have an export license. They should have connections with other factories that provide supplemental products (packaging, printing, etc.) that domestic only factories often do not have. Often they have available labor for finishing/packaging so you don’t have to move everything to a third party. They are usually located in more user-friendly areas of China and have Internet access too.

One of the biggest problems that I have had with factories at this level is IP violations. They are still basically working on a Chinese domestic price structure but they are doing QC at more of an international level—they’ve just not done the price analysis to understand the direct cost impacts fully. So if you have major issues or a great-selling product, these guys are the ones that are going to be willing to sell you out, literally. They see what they are missing out on with international retail pricing. They can do the market research (or at least Google searches) and get a pretty good idea of what you’re making on the product they’re manufacturing.

I work mostly with factories at this level. Why? Because I’m here and I have QC that is in the factory 4-5 days a week. We speak both Mandarin and Cantonese so we know (as much as is possible) what is going on in the factory. We do both factory audits before we start projects and unannounced QC visits during projects. We pull molds out of factories when we’re done with production. We coordinate and confirm disposal of rejected goods. We sign contracts in China, work with lawyers in China, and we expect to get the local prices and the international quality—why? Because we put a lot of value-added into the relationship.

I would NEVER work with factories at this level if I was not here or had someone here representing me. Some people do and pull it off. To them I say, “more power to you.” But I won’t take the risk. There is not enough trust or safeguards to ensure that I can get exactly what I want unless I’m here to confirm it directly.

Purely International

The last type of factory is the kind that you’ll find on the higher-end sourcing websites like Global Sources. Their business is completely export oriented. They are in full or at least half foreign owned and may have a large client with a major ownership stake. OR they are partial or fully (Chinese) state owned. And while ownership may sound insignificant if you’ve never worked in China before, those who have worked here know that this often does make a difference.

This “foreign” ownership, even if it’s other Chinese owners from Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore or Malaysia, is different from purely domestic ownership in a number of important respects. First, even if they don’t actually do business like you’re used to in the West they understand and have experience with international standards in the past. They will at least have had a dose of western style education to boot. Second they most likely have an overseas office and may still have a factory in another location; which means they are easier to track down if there are problems.

Interestingly most foreigners doing business here seem to support this idea—just the fact that ownership is not local means that there is a different attitude (varying degrees from factory to factory, of course) in the business relationship. Conversely most Chinese I talk with have the exact opposite sentiment. I don’t think I’ve ever heard a good word from a Mainlander about an owner or boss from Taiwan, Hong Kong or Singapore.

I’ve also worked with a couple of for-export Chinese State Owned Enterprises (SOE’s). One was a listed company on the shanghai exchange and the other one should have been listed at the local morgue. This disparity in SOE’s is common. While they are typically all relatively (to extremely) large, and have multiple “sub” companies their quality of management, level of debt/loss, professionalism, international experience and clientele couldn’t be more different.

The first SOE we worked with was in Jiangsu province. They have thousands of employees and at least a hundred (I am not exaggerating) smaller companies and factory locations under the corporate umbrella. Their admin people had worked on trade negotiations between the US and China in the late 80’s and early 90’s. Their clientele spans all of Western Europe, the US, South America, the Middle East and even some in Eastern Europe. Minimum order qtty’s are in the 100,000’s of thousands of pieces per SKU. They had their own research and development department and proudly showed off the products that they had invented themselves and sold to clients in the West. They willing worked with LC’s and expected us to do both extensive and strict QC throughout production. The had the latest equipment, western trained MBA’s and one of our clients’ mentions that their equipment was better than anything she’d ever seen in the US.

Now slow down a bit before you start thinking, “See, I knew it! If you just find the right factory you can get the same level of service and quality as you’d get in the west.” I will say that I think that once you’ve done DD on a factory of this size and reputation you may just be able to let them do their work and have relatively positive results. But just because the factory looks the same or better than your factory back home; and just because they have MBA’s working in the glass and steel office building doesn’t mean that you can email an PO and forget about it until it shows up on your warehouse doorstep.

You still need to do QC. I have some foreign associates that do electronics work for some big box stores and they have told me they have the same issues and problems we do—logos are not adhered correctly, products are dirty, upside-down or otherwise missed packaged, deadlines are missed, raw materials are late or sub standard, parts are sub’d out without letting you know about it, etc. This isn’t $100K worth of stitch bags we’re talking about either. We’re talking about scores of container loads of fridges and microwave ovens, hair dryers, TV’s and DVD players.

If you’re not going to be here to do QC, at the very least you need to confirm that what you ordered is what you’re getting and that what you’re getting is actually in the containers being shipped to you.

Limited International

There are some factories that claim to have a completely international clientele. I don’t want to call them liars, but the world is a pretty big place and while producing for Africa and the EU are both technically considered “international” I would submit that they are hardly comparable. Even producing for SEA and the Middle East are not comparable in many instances to what’s expected in the US, the EU and Japan.

I mentioned above that we worked with two SOE’s. The second one was a basket case. We worked with them only because our client didn’t want to pay for new molds and was only looking to modify a product that the SOE currently made, en mass. They had one of the best websites I’ve ever see. They also had huge (empty) buildings in multiple locations. I never saw the thousands of people they claimed to employee. They worked on a cash only basis and our QC was the only QC—we’d accept or reject product and they acted like they couldn’t care less. They had one computer, no one that could speak English and a number of old Red Flag and VW brand sedans. And they had one guy whose business card said “Sales Manager” but who seemed to run everything from Accounts Payable and QC to Sales. We did one order and one re-order with them in a period of about 6 months. The best part of the entire experience was that they were relatively close to a section of the Great Wall. I got some great pics.

The lesson here is that whatever factory you finally choose, you are responsible for the factory that you work with—you have a choice and you need to do the necessary DD, before you pay any money, to ensure that you completely understand what you are getting involved with. If you don’t find out until after you’ve already paid a deposit that your factory sucks—IT’S YOUR FAULT, NOT THEIRS!!

So how do you pick a “good one?” First, I suggest that you find through recommendations (not just a website) at least 3-5 factories that could potentially manufacture your specific product. Talk with them (on line) and get as much information as you can from them and from anyone that knows them. Then spend a few hundred dollars and get some real research done on who they are and what their history is. After you’ve cut the number down to 3 or 4 factories, visit the three that you think would be the best options. If possible, get samples from each of them. Compare prices, production times, sample quality, excuses for problems and your experience visiting the three. When you’re confident, place the order with one but let them know that if the first order doesn’t go well you’ve already got two other options ready to go on line.

Finally, remember that sometimes the “best factory” is not the best to work with. If you can get what you want from the second best factory and they are easier to communicate with, by all means work with them instead.

In my experience, the biggest killers of potentially good deals in China are insufficient QC and DD—and neither of these problems are the factory’s responsibility. Make an informed decision about with whom you are working and then participate often in the production process.

Good luck.

Would you like a gas shortage with your inflation?

Amazing!

Only in China can having an almost complete monopoly on a protected domestic market be a bad thing. The two largest suppliers, Sinopec and PetroChina are now being required by the government to supply more fuel to meet rising domestic demand. Sounds like a good thing right? Think again.

The price of fuel in China is fixed to ensure domestic stability. But the price is fixed at a point that the two big companies can’t compete with the quickly rising international prices of crude. Since China is, via these two companies, a net importer of oil, crude is being bought on the international market for a price that is higher than the fixed domestic price in China—so these two companies are losing money on their state sponsored monopoly!

So who get’s hurt? Well, the rule in business is that the costs get passed along to the consumers. Currently the shortages are being passed onto the retail filling stations and private citizens are the ones being squeezed at the pumps. In addition, the lines of container trucks waiting outside of filling stations all over the country has been well documented.

Each summer for the last few years, as demand goes up, privately owned factories get hit too. And, when it get’s really bad (usually May through September) regional electricity providers implement rolling blackouts. We’ve worked with factories that have had up to three days a week with no power—that means that projects that were bid out at 20 days for product times will actually take more than 30.

As inflation in China continues to rise and (if) the price of oil continues to rise too, expect to see less and less imported oil in China. Sinopec and PetroChina aren’t stupid. They want to make money—and importing oil for a higher price than you can sell it at home makes no financial sense. There are already reports that they are selling what limited domestic supplies they have on the international market since the price there is so much better (further exacerbating the domestic shortages). Expect to see higher prices at the Chinese pumps. Expect to have another summer of shortages, rolling blackouts and higher prices for container trucking—if you’re producing inland, your cost advantage just shrunk.

I’m not sure what’s worse for an harmonious society, high gasoline price or power shortages.

The best comment ever (not) made about China

I apologize in advance for not being able to source this comment. It was aired on a TV show about media and education to a Wharton School audience. I got into the show after it started and I don’t know who made this comment. But it was great and can be applied specifically to China.

 

“It is very easy to believe in what you think even though you may actually be out of touch with reality.”

So it got me thinking. How do I get in touch with the reality of my Chinese manufacturing situation? I don’t know if I’m “right” or if I’m out in left field while the world goes by, but I did come up with a couple of ideas that I use to at least confirm what I think is really what’s happening around me.

First, seeing is believing. If you don’t see everything (check it off a list) it may not have happened. This is important for almost all parts of all products (molds, assembly, packaging, printing) but most important if you are making products that have a functioning component or a specific standard that must be met.

Second, QC, QC and more QC. You should be testing and monitoring and reporting on every step of the process. I’ve heard the guys from BV say that products should be tested (not just QC’d) anywhere from six to nine times in the production cycle to be safe and sure. I don’t test that many times personally, but we certainly QC more than a few times per project.

Third, “their” reality. You need to know that there may be contradictory forces working against your projects success. Whether it’s politics, money, face or any number of other issues it behooves you (I always want to say that phrase) to find out what’s “really” going on. Sometimes you’ll be pleasantly surprised. Other times, you’ll be glad you found problems sooner than later.

Fourth, have someone do QC on your QC. This is usually me, for our company. It’s not a lack of trust, I really have great QC guys, but it is a double check that standards are being followed all the time.

Fifth, some parts of the project you just have to do yourself. I do all our printing. Nothing ruins months of work on a project like poor package printing—it’s relatively cheap and just not worth having something that isn’t even part of the product ruin a job.
This concept of checking up on the relationship of your beliefs and your reality works in other areas too. Here are a couple of other things related to working in China.

Learn from North Korea, or at least the UN’s position with NK: Trust but Verify. You have to trust other people. It’ll kill you to doubt and worry about everyone. It’s just not worth it. You have to, at some point, trust both the people around you and organizations you are working with. So confirm everything before you spend money. Then confirm everything after you spend money. But let them do their job. Be upfront and make sure they know that your job is specifically to check up on their job performance.

Now a few less practical thoughts on the subject of “reality” in China. See? I told you it really got me thinking.

In Asia, fate and cycles are much more important than you or I probably will ever really understand. If you grew up in the west you were educated/indoctrinated in the theology of self-determination; e.g. you have the ability to choose your own future. And even if “the gods” have predetermined your future you at least can affect it to a (large) degree. For many people here, this just isn’t the “reality.”

This isn’t an East vs. West, or a right or wrong proposition. It’s just that what you believe my not be the actionable reality for your Chinese counter parts. This certainly affects the wiliness of employees to innovate, take initiative and think outside the box.

Finally, I think that it’s really hard to be Chinese—your environment both physically and socially is changing quickly, not to mention you have to manage the rules about face, fate, guanxi, and all within the massive and rapid changes of the last thirty years and in increasingly westernized business context to boot.

Think about this Chinese “reality”:

• Just about everyone over 50 in China never had more than some primary education. But today, you can’t work at McDonalds without a college degree.

• 20 years ago they still weren’t using cash in most of the economy—they were still using coupons from their work units.

• If your primary education is from the Chinese system and your MBA is from the West you have two completely different concepts of how the world works competing within your head.

• As a factory, probably most of your supply chain is working in a solely cash system while most of your customers are certainly working in a credit and terms system.

• If you save face by hiding and personally solving problems but your foreign client wants to know-all and see-all when push comes to shove what do you sacrifice? Your own personal face or your professional relationship?

• Are time and experiences linier or cyclical?

• If your boss is foreign and rewards individuality but your manager is Chinese and punishes anyone out of step with the system, who do you work for?

I’d love some reality checks—anyone else have any thoughts on the subject?

The ever-present past, the moon and The (Chinese) Man

With the release of yet another “epic Chinese period piece” in theaters this month I have to ask: Have you ever noticed that everything great about China is, well, old?  I’m not talking about the factories or the economy; I’m talking about the popular culture.  Ask the Chinese themselves about China’s greatness and you’ll most likely get something like I get from people I ask: “we should be one of the great countries of the world like we were.” Or “The greatest thing about China are its history of 6000 years.”  I have never had a single Chinese person answer me something that wasn’t political or historical in answer to this question in the 12 years that I’ve been here and been asking.

Now, that’s not all bad.  I’m here in China because I think that China’s history is very interesting.  The Chinese past is fascinating to visit on vacation, but it’s, well, past.  I’m here for the now and the next.  When I’m on vacation I do want to see the past and I regularly visit places like The Great Wall, The Terra Cotta Warriors, temples, museums, etc.  But my children and I don’t live in China’s past other than these brief visits.  But in this view we seem to be a minority.

For example, my in-laws (Chinese) watch Chinese soap operas every day—all set in dynasties centuries past.  Chinese movies in theaters today are mostly about, yes you guessed it, the past.  Indeed it seems that a “modern” Chinese movie is set in turn of the century Shanghai.  Turn of the 19th century, that is.

In recent years China has built more million-plus-people cities from scratch than any other country in the world.  They’ve had growth that boggles the mind and economic theories for 30 years.  They’ve put a man into space, orbited the moon and are now racing—and yes, have a good chance of beating—the US back to the moon.  That’s incredible!  Their future is so bright, if not for the pollution, you’d have to wear shades!

Where is the independent social culture that mirrors these great modern Chinese achievements?

I’m saying this as a Chinese History buff too—I was a Chinese History major in College and I studied Chinese (and Thai) anthropology in grad school.  I married a Chinese.  I speak Chinese.  I read 20-30 books a year on China.  I have lived in China for 9 of the last 12 years.  But just I don’t get the obsession with the past.  Can history really be that popular to 1.3 billion other people?  What about the present?  The future?

I grew up in the 70’s and 80’s in the US.  The US had just won the space race by going to the moon in ’69; the resultant cultural phenomenon was literally an overnight explosion of everything space in 60’s.  And that look-to-the-future space culture has lasted for more than the next 40 years in the West.  I grew up watching Buck Rodgers, Star Trek, Battlestar Galactica, Pigs in Space, Star Wars, Alien, The Terminator and Inter-planet Janet.

Don’t get me wrong, I also love America’s history so I don’t see anything wrong with Chinese patriotism and love of the past.  George, Tom, Ben, Alex, Teddy, Lincoln, Philadelphia, Boston, Washington DC.  I love it.  We were, and I think, still are, great!  I’ve read 8 books on US history in the last two years.  I bought Ken Burns’ documentaries (plural).  “My” US history is special to me, because it’s a part of who I am and I really want to know more and I want my kids to know both their roots—both Chinese and American.

So before you think I’m just another foreigner basing China and you glibly respond, “other countries do it too,” think about this: when was the last time you saw a top-ten movie about the American Revolution?  When was the last time a Prime Time or even Day Time TV show was made about James Town?  Columbus?  Philadelphia? 1776? (Since I wrote this John Adams has come out on HBO to great reviews—and it’s a surprise exception, to the rule, is it not?) When was the last time you watched anything about US history because of its entertainment value?  Outside of Shakespeare and Emily Bronte what plays/movies have you watched about Victorian England?  Even Disney’s current Shaolin Showdown cartoon is based in the future has tons of technology mixed in with martial arts and classical style Chinese artistry.  It’s certainly not old people reliving old stories in old dress.

Now maybe the American economy is dying a quick death this year.  Indeed, optimism in the future of the US is down to record lows.  But Hollywood isn’t pumping out a list of Civil War and American Revolution movies this summer to raise our collective spirits.  Nor is the US govt funding special programs to remind us that “we once were great.”

Which brings me to The Man, Chinese version.

Can you honestly tell me that the Chinese kids of today, who, by the way, watch all the US movies on knock-off DVD, really would rather watch cartoons about the Tang dynasty, 18th century Shaolin monks, and heroic CCP soldiers?  Really?  Do you honestly believe that Chinese professionals, business people, teenagers and MWM—“Mainlanders With Money,” as Diligence Calls them calls them—really want to watch controlled and edited versions of the past glories/tragedies while other waking hours are spent checking stocks online, working for a house, a Benz, a Rolex, an iPod, etc.?

Outside of Ang Lee (Taiwan), Jet Lee, Zhang Zhiyi, Chao Yangfat (Hong Kong) and Jacky Chan  (Hong Kong) how many Chinese are competitive in the international film industry?  Not many, so many of the Chinese films are in part State sponsored (or at least State allowed).  The recent banning of Tang Wei would support this.  Further, The Chinese Man limits the number of US films that are show in Chinese theaters to less than 10 a year to reduce competition.  When you control exposure and competition you have a captive audience and can show anything you want—including the same historical novels over and over again.

Starting way back in 1995 I remember the Chinese press bemoaning the fact that China didn’t have it’s own domestic cartoons.  Yes, this was a national identity crisis for many university students reading the People’s Daily.  So The Man stepped into the manufactured crisis and promoted local artists.  Not all bad, certainly.  But the limit of foreign films and the promotions of local films and cartoons isn’t the best way to promote diversity or quality—but maybe that’s not the point, eh?

But the manipulation of thousands of years of history for a current, short-term political goal is a big deal.  All of the Chinese history you see today is carefully edited and presented in a context that is not “dangerous” to The Man, current version.  Now certainly America and other countries manipulate history to some degree but free press, independent filmmakers and colleges and universities push back and indeed, more “history” comes from private sources than government sources in the West for sure.

Maybe the goal is an actual experiment on the admonition that those who don’t remember the past are forced to relive it.  Could it be that The Man here is hoping that this time his dynasty will not end in disaster?  Certainly.  But what price is The Man paying in lost creativity and entrepreneurialism?

I can’t believe that the promotion of Chinese history at the expense of the future isn’t going to be a problem, in the future.  I can’t believe that education that is based on memorizing how “great we used to be” isn’t somehow limiting future generations creative ability.  Like the child who’s always told he’s smarter than everyone else, he soon becomes scared of failure and trying new things.  Idolize the past at the expense of the future.

I really just want my kids to see the Chinese version of the Muppets’ Pigs in Space—come on, that’s not too much to ask, is it?

One More Note on (Chinese) Politics

Last political stump, I promise.  I’ve avoided the incredibly huge white elephant in the room over this last week simply because I want to stay on line.  But I need to say something.  These two posts are concise but thought provoking; compare this about Ta!wan to this about T!bet.

I do most of my project management with clients via the internet and so I try to stay away from overtly political issues.  But there are “non-business” issues that affect business and affect the individuals involved in business.

By the way, if you think that the issues last weekend in T!bet, the elections this weekend in Ta!wan, the Olympics in August and the US presidential elections in November will not affect your business in China, you are mistaken.  These are important issues that affect who you can work with, the balance of trade and import/export policies, how much information you’ll have access to, the prices for materials and labor, the accessibility of markets and products, taxes, visas and most importantly the lives of real people.